In addition to Better Buildings Neighborhood Program Summary of Reported Data From July 1, 2010 – September 30, 2013, the following table presents summaries of data reported by an organization awarded federal financial assistance (e.g., grants, cooperative agreements) by DOE’s Better Buildings Neighborhood Program (BBNP) from July 2010 or September 2010 through September 30, 2013. Although some awards were extended into 2014, only the data reported through the end of September 2013 are included in each individual summary. Where applicable, the table also provides individual program evaluation reports. To learn more about individual partners, explore the Better Buildings partner profiles.
Better Buildings Partner | Summary of Reported Data | Evaluation Report(s) |
---|---|---|
Alabama – SEP | Summary | |
Austin, Texas | Summary | |
Bainbridge Island, Washington | Summary | |
Bedford, New York | Summary | |
Boulder County, Colorado | Summary | |
Camden, New Jersey | Summary | |
Chicago, Illinois | Summary | |
Cincinnati, Ohio | Summary | |
Connecticut | Summary | |
Eagle County, Colorado | Summary | |
Fayette County, Pennsylvania | Summary | |
Greensboro, North Carolina | Summary | |
Indianapolis, Indiana | Summary | |
Kansas City, Missouri | Summary | |
Los Angeles County, California | Summary | Evaluation* |
Lowell, Massachusetts | Summary | |
Maine | Summary | Evaluation 1 Evaluation 2 Evaluation 3 |
Maine – SEP | Summary | |
Maryland | Summary | |
Massachusetts – SEP | Summary | |
Michigan | Summary | |
Michigan – SEP | Summary | |
Missouri | Summary | |
Nevada – SEP | Summary | |
New Hampshire | Summary | Evaluation† |
New York | Summary | |
Omaha, Nebraska | Summary | |
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania | Summary | |
Phoenix, Arizona | Summary | |
Portland, Oregon | Summary | |
Rutland County, Vermont | Summary | Evaluation |
San Antonio, Texas | Summary | |
Santa Barbara County, California | Summary | |
Seattle, Washington | Summary | Evaluation |
SEEA Southeast Consortium | Summary | Evaluation 1 Evaluation 2 Evaluation 3 Evaluation 4 Evaluation 5 Evaluation 6 Evaluation 7 |
St. Lucie County, Florida | Summary | |
Toledo, Ohio | Summary | |
University Park, Maryland | Summary | Evaluation 1 Evaluation 2‡ |
Virginia – SEP | Summary | |
Washington – SEP | Summary | |
Wisconsin | Summary |
* The Los Angeles County, California, Evaluation Report is included in the Final Technical Report, beginning on page 416 (Appendix C).
† The New Hampshire Evaluation Report is included in the Final Technical Report, beginning on page 46.
‡ The University Park, Maryland, Evaluation Report 2 is included in the Final Technical Report, beginning on page 117.